//=time() ?>
After seeing so many discussions of gen9 mons~it's hard to find a line of Pokemon without some sorta controversies~design wise. No wonder these 2 mons can win the vote. I barely see a single negetive comment about them. Also For me these 2 feel like the most natural to like.
There aren’t many Pokémon that don’t have eyes. If I don’t tell the origin can you guess its types? Having said that~as time goes by~I do consider change some type combinations for different perspectives. This thing is roughly having 5 choices to go.
Basically a perfect open-world should have every...or at least a certain amount of sections working like those in New Pokemon Snap. If that's too much to ask for then seriously I don't expect an fully open-world. If you can't make big things~then at least make small things good.
Seriously they bothered to twist the tails for the Blaze breed and the gave the Aqua breed a swimming animation...why did they just refuse to do more color changes~not even for the shinies? Why?
I mean seriously...call Pokemon look like Digimon when you see they do spiders like these. Pokemon designs are still quite loyal to what animals they are based of~right?
Let's take a look at these 4 spiders.
Ariados is a fairly generic start. Poison is like a default element for a spider but we can't say it has nothing on it. At least it looks quite pretty. Galvantula has a more fancy element plus a rather popular species~nothing goes wrong.
@Godzilla73rules It's fine in Tokusatsu becasue that's how they handle the suit like the early Seabozu. But that's really not how it's supposed to make fossil mons and ancestors......
Octillery is the case that I like the most. Probably becaasue I like octopus and I like the color red. Also it can shot beams! https://t.co/nAD7gONsUW