realm.
The last main factor (before conclusion) is economics. The 100 years war didn't see as much change in France for the economy as in England.The French economy remained much more agricultural in nature and therefore maintained a religious society on a stable rural structure
captured) and Agincourt had caused the French to disassociate the king from battle. The French king therefore was forced to further fall onto religion as a justification for the crown while kings of England became much more closely associated with governmental and military
with king Edward the III and Henry the V both gaining huge popularity through military success, military success became a measure of success in and of itself in England. Meanwhile in France the devastating defeats at Crecy (were the king had fled), Poitiers (were the king was
In the 100 years war the entire French aristocracy was almost completely wiped out.
At the battle of Poitiers alone, it's estimated that around 40% of the French knighthood disappeared and at the battle of Agincourt that number is between 70-80%.
@hichamr49866923 @Shaggy80740251 @JamalsNews @mgulluoglu @BBCWorld @AlJazeera @AP Wrong, the British under the peel commission was literally willing to give you almost all of the land. The reason it was rejected is because the arabs wanted all of it and hated jews.
This seat has been labour since its very conception in 1974...Boris has absolutely pulverized the 'red wall' and the leftists have already started accusing them of being unintelligent and saying the defeat was inevitable and had nothing to do with the parties politics and leader. https://t.co/pcT40JJkC5