Taepodongさんのイラストまとめ

4/

using this nice model for example, regardless of if the cable raceways are sticking out of the body, the instrument section is always as wide as the base of the warhead. but here (pic 3), the warhead base is slightly thinner than the instrument section just like Borkan-3.

some more mediocre ones

type 63 APC. a classic.

another drawing depicting ALASBM. This one here is simply a M-20 (DF-12?)/Iskander.

A few thoughts on Nuri (KSLV-II), which is very similar in lift-off thrust and config to CZ-4C, but capacity of CZ-4C with low efficiency military propellant almost doubled that of Nuri (2.8 t/700km SSO vs 1.5t/600-800km) despite the latter burns LOX/RP1 1/https://t.co/B9Zi3q8Rsx

just my periodical J-8 posting....(ignore "IIM". it is just a cutaway of a standard J-8II)

And the R-27 is big, even looks big on a twin mid-thrust engine jet. 230 mm wide vs AIM-7's 203 mm. Dont know how difficult it would be for NK to reverse-engineer the seeker and fuse technology and utilize them on a 400 to 500 mm diameter SAM. https://t.co/CnEWYLkWM9

Question: does the Russian 300 mm rocket has two solid propellant sections? consulted with a Russian friend but still no definite answer. The official drawing is curious....

PLA Navy aviation did a 24 hour AWACS long time flight training recently. https://t.co/63lJLuhqnC